Northern Ag Network
Northern Ag Network
Northern Broadcasting System    Northern News Network    Northern Sports Network
Search This Site...
Search This Site...
Grizzly Bears Are Not Always Good Neighbors

Grizzly Bears Are Not Always Good Neighbors

9/5/2018 2:28:00 PM/Categories: Popular Posts, General News, Today's Top 5, Opinions, Ag Issues

by Cyndi Johnson, Vice President of the Montana Farm Bureau Federation

I farm grain in Montana on the Rocky Mountain Front. Sixty miles to the west are mountains with gorgeous rolling hills, but the rest of our landscape is flat—not exactly prime grizzly bear habitat. However, someone forgot to tell the bears.

The Endangered Species Act lists the grizzly bear as threatened in the Mountain Prairie region of the American West, except for right around Yellowstone Park. The federal government controls the management of this bear although the original intent of the ESA was to include state and local governments, as well as farmers and ranchers, in the decision-making. 

The first human-bear interaction in my county that caused significant concern was on a weekend two years ago when a sow (mother) grizzly was teaching her two yearling cubs to hunt. The mother bear took her cubs to what she must have thought was her private hunting preserve. In fact, it was my best friend’s sheep ranch. The bears killed and mutilated 75 ewes, rams and lambs in two nights’ “hunting” and they didn’t eat a single one. This was just one more incident that proves ag pays where bears stay.

Early in June this year, one local business had to close in order to “manage” a grizzly that wandered into town, putting both human and bear lives in danger.   
Bears have been spotted as far as 300 miles from the front in Central Montana–tipping over bee hives and ripping doors off full grain bins. I have full grain bins, and that concerns me. 

Grizzly bears have been within a few miles of me and my home. The standard response to these problem bears is usually relocation, if the bear survives the encounter. Unfortunately, that doesn’t always result in a bear that stays put in his or her new home as they will wander hundreds of miles back to the scene of the crime.

Reform of the ESA is finally being discussed by government officials in Washington. Proposals have been made to re-evaluate the original legislation and improve the rules that rob states and communities of the ability to address the local threats presented by the bears. 

The ESA also contains unfunded mandates for which local and state communities shoulder the cost. It says actions designed to protect a species take precedence over infrastructure and development. For example, to repair a road, special (and costly) barriers must be erected to prevent bears and other wildlife from entering construction zones. This includes the cost of designing and building avenues for wildlife to cross or fences with dirt fill on both sides so critters don’t have to jump or crawl under. 

Some of the mandates also strike at the individual level. My goat-raising neighbor is being required, at her own expense, to add tall electric fencing to prevent bears from eating her goats and their food. Again, ag pays when the bears stay. 

Even with all these rules, the ESA has only been three percent successful in recovering listed species. Imagine if only three percent of your beef or milk was acceptable for market or only three percent of your students could pass your class. Amending this act is necessary.

Let’s bring every stakeholder back to the table to take care of the problems with the ESA.  

Solutions should include incentives, rather than relying solely on unfunded mandates and penalties. These solutions could include pilot projects to reduce human-bear encounters, like the one in Valier, Montana, where a driver is paid to picked up livestock carcasses and move them to a landfill, thus cutting down the prospects of unwanted bear visitations.

The ESA also needs to provide resources to encourage better livestock safety, animal feed storage and grain storage in remote areas if we are to continue having this increase and mobility in the bear population.

Human life and safety are important. Bear life and safety are important. Let’s tell Congress to continue the hard work of updating the Endangered Species Act. Let’s help our grizzly bears become better neighbors.


1 comments on article "Grizzly Bears Are Not Always Good Neighbors"


Roy Sherrard

9/7/2018 12:31 PM

I use to farm in the southeast bottom of Toole County. I was a Mt Livestock deputy, Toole County Deputy. When these bears start attacking children waiting for a bus then things will change. It will happen! There are bear now south of Chester along the Maria’s River. This is unreasonable!

Leave a comment

Add comment


Recent Ag News

American Crystal, Big Sky Sugar Discuss Future of Sidney, MT Processing Facility

11/20/2018 11:20:00 AM
Representatives of American Crystal Sugar Company and Big Sky Sugar Cooperative announced today that they have signed a non-binding letter of intent providing the framework by which Big Sky would become the owner of the Sidney, MT sugar processing facility.  >> Read More
Article rating: No rating

New Brucellosis Infection Reported in Wyoming's Sublette County

11/20/2018 8:19:00 AM
Wyoming state veterinarian, Dr. Jim Logan, has been notified by the Wyoming State Veterinary Laboratory and the National Veterinary Services Laboratory there is another new case of brucellosis in a cattle herd in Wyoming - this time in Sublette County which is in the Wyoming Brucellosis Designated Surveillance Area (DSA).  >> Read More
Article rating: No rating

Army Greens Uniform Heavy on American Wool

11/20/2018 5:26:00 AM
The United States Army announced on Veteran's Day that it is adopting an iconic uniform - the Army Greens - as its new service uniform. This is the uniform worn by America's Greatest Generation in World War II.  >> Read More
Article rating: No rating

Get Your BQA Certification Now—Some Packers To Require It in 2019

11/20/2018 5:17:00 AM
Earlier this year, several beef packers announced they would require Beef Quality Assurance (BQA) certification from fed cattle suppliers, starting Jan. 1, 2019. Leaders from Tyson and Cargill say this effort is driven by beef retailers and consumers, who are asking for more information about how cattle are raised. >> Read More
Article rating: No rating

Cattlemen Want Alternative Proteins Properly Regulated

11/19/2018 1:06:00 PM
Montana ranchers produce some of highest quality beef you’ll find anywhere. But here of late, plant-based proteins and lab grown meat have grabbed the headlines and cattlemen and cattlewomen want to protect the integrity of their industry thru proper labeling of these alternative proteins. >> Read More
Article rating: No rating

Find Articles by Date

«November 2018»