Northern Ag Network
Northern Ag Network
Northern Broadcasting System    Northern News Network    Northern Sports Network
Search This Site...
Search This Site...
A Wild Idea to Solve the Wild Horse Problem

A Wild Idea to Solve the Wild Horse Problem

1/2/2019 3:30:00 PM/Categories: Popular Posts, General News, Today's Top 5, Ag Issues, Wild Horses

Written by Hannah Downey and Tate Watkins, originally published in the 2018 Winter issue of the Property and Environment Research Center Magazine


Spanish explorers are credited with first introducing horses to North America in the 1500s. The 83,000 wild horses and burros that currently roam 27 million acres of western public land are descendants of those first American equines, which came to symbolize the pride and wildness of the West. Many of the animals escaped from or were released by those early explorers or, later, by Native Americans, the U.S. Cavalry, or western ranchers.

 

As homesteaders and public land management agencies spread westward over the centuries, they either drove out or killed wild horses that competed with them for pasture and forage. By the 1970s, in response to concerns from horse advocates about the future of the animals, President Richard Nixon signed the Wild Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act into effect, directing the Bureau of Land Management to manage and protect wild horses and burros.

 

Today, there are simply too many horses and burros on too little range. With federal protections and no natural predators, the populations of the free-roaming animals have skyrocketed. In many areas, mustangs overgraze to the point that there is no forage left, meaning they literally face the prospect of starving to death on public rangelands. Vegetation and water sources are being depleted from Oregon down to Arizona, and native species such as elk and sage grouse are being displaced.

 

The BLM sets an appropriate management level for wild horses based on the amount of rangeland available, a figure that currently stands at 27,000 animals. But current populations are more than three times that designated carrying capacity—and are on pace to double every four years.

 

In an effort to prevent the demise of both wild horses and rangeland ecosystems, the BLM has resorted to gathering excess animals and moving them to off-range corrals and pastures. The agency offers these horses and burros up for adoption to good homes using auctions, but it requires interested adopters to pay a minimum bid of $125. Though this approach has had a degree of success, nearly 51,000 horses and burros remain in off-range facilities. According to the BLM, the lifetime cost of caring for a single horse in one of these facilities is approximately $48,000.

 

The total annual cost to taxpayers for the holding facilities runs to $50 million—or more than half of the entire Wild Horse and Burro Program budget. The agency has explored using permanent sterilization or even euthanasia as alternatives to wrangle in the horse populations, but political divisions on the issue have prevented implementing these techniques.

 

One way to ensure horses neither starve to death on the range nor cost taxpayers exorbitant amounts in off-range facilities is to get more of them adopted into private homes. Last spring, the BLM proposed an innovative approach to do just that: flip the auction script. In a report to Congress, the agency suggested paying potential adopters $1,000 to take in a horse or burro.

 

The idea of using incentive payments to achieve sustainable wild horse and burro populations is one that’s been researched by PERC fellows Randy Rucker, Tim Fitzgerald, and Vanessa Elizondo. “Why are taxpayers shelling out $50,000 a head to care for horses whose value is so low that no qualified private horse buyer is willing to offer $125 for one?” they’ve asked. Their research suggests that a $100 payment from the BLM to adopters would likely have been enough to ensure almost all of the animals in long-term holding facilities over the past several decades would have been adopted—a potential savings to taxpayers of $450 million.

 

The Bureau of Land Management has decided to implement this idea on a trial basis in 2019. The agency will pay adopters a $500 first installment 60 days after adoption, once new owners have demonstrated that they’re providing quality homes. After a 12-month probationary period to ensure the adopted animals are being treated well, owners will receive title to their horse or burro, and the second $500 payment will follow 60 days after the title transfer.  

 

The plan has the potential to help improve the lives of wild horses while also benefiting taxpayers. Owning and caring for a horse is not cheap. The $1,000 payment should promote adoptions as the stipend can help cover veterinary and training costs. This sort of approach has been widely used by animal shelters that offer free adoptions or waivers for veterinary care to help get pets placed in loving homes, and it has potential to make a real difference in the lives of wild horses and burros.

 

Adoption is clearly a better outcome for a wild horse than starving on the range or living out the rest of its days in an overcrowded corral. For taxpayers, the per-horse savings is undeniable. Spending $1,000 to find a mustang a good home is orders of magnitude cheaper—and likely much more humane—than caring for it in a government holding facility for the rest of its life.

 

In addition, taking horses and burros off public rangelands can alleviate major pressures on western ecosystems. Solving the wild horses crisis will allow vegetation to regrow and land to recover from overgrazing, reducing competition for forage and water among other wildlife.

 

Wild horse and burro management is an issue fraught with emotion and complicated by biological and political concerns. But it’s clear that the status quo is failing horses and burros, public rangelands, and taxpayers alike. The saga of the wild horse in America may be playing out in the New West, but it follows a well-worn theme—competition over scarce natural resources often leads to conflict. Paying ranchers, families, or other willing parties to adopt wild horses and burros is a step toward reining in the problem in the 21st century.

 

 

Founded in 1980 by a handful of outdoor-oriented economists in Bozeman, Montana, PERC—the Property and Environment Research Center—is a conservation and research institute dedicated to free market environmentalism. PERC is dedicated to working with conservationists, policymakers, scholars, and journalists to understand the root of environmental conflict and move toward innovative solutions. 

Print

7 comments on article "A Wild Idea to Solve the Wild Horse Problem"

0
1

L greaves

1/3/2019 3:47 PM

This is insane. If getting paid 500 up front is what motivates you to take a horse it shows the motive. So people will take 10 horses make $5000 drive to Mexico and make another $5000 when they sell them to Slaughter. $10,000 in a couple of days. And they have changed the rules to allow 24 a day so should double that amount. Just admit you are paying to get the horses Slaughtered.


0
1

Dedra Fidel

1/3/2019 5:20 PM

Why were grazing livestock not mentioned in these scenarios? How bout an honest perspective on the situation?!!!


3
0

J S

1/4/2019 6:46 AM

Umm.. one of us did not read correctly . I understand it to say that you only get the first $500 after the first 60 days Inspection passes- the adoption agreements clearly state that you have to keep the animal yourself or surrender it back - you can only sell or rehome it after you have had it for one year and it passes A SECOND INSPECTION ( kinda dips into that profit you were talking about)


0
0

Margie buyer

1/4/2019 8:30 AM

Wouldn’t it be more humane, if you have say, 100 horses dying slowly of starvation or lack of water, take out 50 of them so the others can live. Build our own HUMANE

FACILITY HERE ,, send the meat to feed the animals in the local humane societies,

Zoos, whatever. Keep them out of foreign slaughter houses, or tiny backyards alone.

The problem has to be solved, not easy, but the land can’t take the overgrazing and

The horses the suffering.


0
2

Laura Hawkins

1/7/2019 10:01 AM

If USA can spend billions for a needless wall we can afford to take care of our wild horses and Burros. We have a president who fails to value our horses and wildlife so he won’t help. We must go around him and take care of our horses


0
0

Western Horse Watchers

1/13/2019 10:42 AM

You can't discuss wild horses and burros without discussing livestock and public-lands ranching. Article is biased.

https://westernhorsewatchers.com/


0
0

Rob Winn

1/15/2019 10:31 AM

The article misses the entire point and issue. Feral nonnative animals have no place on any of our wild lands unless they can be managed to prevent negative consequences on native wildlife.

As such unless the BLM has total control of where, when and how many horses are on the range, there should be no horses at all. A true conservationist will see the only acceptable answer is the complete removal of the feral horses from the range.

Leave a comment

Name:
Email:
Comment:
Add comment

Name:
Email:
Subject:
Message:
x

Recent Ag News

Sheep Producers Flock to New Orleans

1/23/2019 9:56:00 AM
This week the nations lamb and wool producers are gathering in New Orleans, LA for the American Sheep Industry Association’s (ASI) annual convention. ASI continues to be a voice for the nation's sheep producers as the group hosts its 154th Convention. 
 

>> Read More
Article rating: No rating

Trick Your Cows into Calving in Daylight Hours

1/22/2019 4:20:00 PM
Any producer wanting to have more cows and heifers calve in daylight hours should try to delay putting out hay and cubes until late in the day. >> Read More
Article rating: No rating

USDA to Reopen all FSA Offices for Most Services During Government Shutdown

1/22/2019 4:06:00 PM

All Farm Service Agency (FSA) service centers will be open beginning January 24 to provide the majority of FSA services needed by farmers and ranchers during this critical time of the year for agricultural operations. Additionally, the limited FSA loan services initially made available at certain FSA county offices beginning January 17 will continue January 22 and 23.


>> Read More
Article rating: No rating

Bovine Tuberculosis Identified in SE North Dakota

1/22/2019 11:31:00 AM

Bovine TB was found in a herd in Sargent County, North Dakota.

>> Read More
Article rating: No rating

FSA Offices to Reopen Temporarily

1/16/2019 12:50:00 PM
Certain FSA offices will temporarily reopen during normal business hours January 17, 18 and 22 with limited services. >> Read More
Article rating: No rating
RSS

Find Articles by Date

«January 2019»
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
56
81112
1517181920
2124252627
28293031123
45678910