GM Labeling, Animal Welfare, & Your Right to Ranch


Two states that didn’t end up with much of the spotlight during the presidential election did gain a bit more of that fame when it comes to the agricultural vote.  

In California, a proposition that would have required labeling of biotech food products was defeated.  Proposition 37 would have reportedly cost every consumer in the state an average of $400 annually and would have made California the first state to require such a label on GMO products.


In North Dakota, Measure 3 passed by a margin of nearly 2 to 1.  This measure protects the ability of a farmer or rancher to use agricultural technology and modern livestock and ranching practices in their operation.  It prohibits any law that abridges this right.


Also in North Dakota, Measure 5 was defeated.  This measure, which carried the backing of the Humane Society of the United States, would have made it a class C felony to maliciously and intentionally harm a cat, dog, or horse.



© Northern Ag Network 2012

Haylie Shipp




Leave a Comment

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
* By using the Northern Ag Network comment form, you agree to your email being collected for use on Northern Ag Network related projects, newsletters, and other content. We do not, and will not, sell your information.