The Great GMO Debate: Are Farmers More Scientifically Astute?

by

by Jo Windmann, AgWeb

According to a Pew survey, 88{f2533179b7c7e7cbdbc11018732de14c82f3d44c9f1e829e9a046cc47141a2e6} of scientists approve the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs), while only  35{f2533179b7c7e7cbdbc11018732de14c82f3d44c9f1e829e9a046cc47141a2e6} of adult Americans accept GMOs as safe. As University of Illinois Extension specialist, Mike Roagee says, “That’s a huge range in differences of opinions between the scientific community and the general populous.”

This survey, Roagee notes, is further proof the American people are skeptical of science. On the other hand, many farmers are less skeptical of genetically engineered (GE) crops. The lack of scientific skepticism, Roagee assumes is due to farmers being more scientifically astute, but explains farmers primarily look at the economics of their crops.

Given the steady uptick in the overall use of GE crops since 1996, his assumption might not be far-fetched. According to USDA-ERS, the adoption of GE varieties by U.S. farmers is widespread with 170 million acres planted in 2013.

Given, this is based on commodity crops, such as soybeans, corn and cotton, but it shows farmers’ increased acceptance of genetically modified varieties over a more than 15 year span, while consumer acceptance declines.

If farmers trust GMOs and agree with the majority scientific community regarding the safety of GM plants, why do they still plant conventional crops when given the choice? It’s all about economics, Roagee says. If they can plant non-GMOs without worrying about additional pest control—and get a premium for their crop—it’s really a win-win.

CLICK HERE to read the full article

 

 

Source:  AgWeb

 

 

I-10 Corn Field by VoxLive, on Flickr
Creative Commons Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic License   by  VoxLive 

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x